說明
This data was collected by Biogeotech for the baseline assessment of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report (ESIA) for the proposed greenfield Armenian Sisian-Kajaran section of the North-South Road Corridor (NSRC) (the Project). It covers species occurrence for birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians and plants.
資料紀錄
此資源出現紀錄的資料已發佈為達爾文核心集檔案(DwC-A),其以一或多組資料表構成分享生物多樣性資料的標準格式。 核心資料表包含 3,485 筆紀錄。
此 IPT 存放資料以提供資料儲存庫服務。資料與資源的詮釋資料可由「下載」單元下載。「版本」表格列出此資源的其它公開版本,以便利追蹤其隨時間的變更。
版本
以下的表格只顯示可公開存取資源的已發布版本。
如何引用
研究者應依照以下指示引用此資源。:
Biogeotech (2024). Biodiversity surveys conducted for Sisian-Kajaran road construction project (EIA). Version 1.0. Biotope. Occurrence dataset. https://ipt-biotope.gbif.fr/resource?r=field_surveys_sisian-kajaran_road&v=1.0
權利
研究者應尊重以下權利聲明。:
此資料的發布者及權利單位為 Biotope。 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY 4.0) License.
GBIF 註冊
此資源已向GBIF註冊,並指定以下之GBIF UUID: da71e98b-ca4a-4f9f-a8a1-87ea58fd449b。 Biotope 發佈此資源,並經由GBIF France同意向GBIF註冊成為資料發佈者。
關鍵字
Occurrence; Observation
聯絡資訊
- 出處
- Expert on ornithofauna
- 出處
- Expert on flora
- 出處
- Expert on amphibians
- 出處
- Expert on Herpetofauna
- 出處
- Expert on mammals
- 連絡人
- E&S manager
地理涵蓋範圍
The road section will directly connect Sisian and Kajaran in Syunik Region, Armenia’s southernmost region.
界定座標範圍 | 緯度南界 經度西界 [39.181, 46.095], 緯度北界 經度東界 [39.537, 46.244] |
---|
分類群涵蓋範圍
無相關描述
Kingdom | Plantae, Animalia |
---|---|
Class | Aves, Reptilia, Amphibia, Mammalia |
時間涵蓋範圍
起始日期 / 結束日期 | 2021-01-08 / 2022-12-03 |
---|
計畫資料
無相關描述
計畫名稱 | Environmental and social impact assessment (ESIA) Sisian-kajaran (north-south corridor) road project, Armenia |
---|---|
經費來源 | European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) |
取樣方法
Suitable specialists conducted the fieldwork for different groups (flora and habitats, terrestrial mammals and bats, birds, reptiles and amphibians, fishes, butterflies). Surveys were conducted over a year (four seasons) to cover the variety of ecological cycles of different target species (breeding, wintering, migration), commensurate with the potential Project risks and impacts.
Surveys were conducted for 16-17 days per season, as appropriate for the various groups of animals and plants, i.e. all four seasons for birds and mammals, spring-summer for reptiles, etc. A summary of these surveys is provided below.
研究範圍 | The study area for the Project includes a 500m corridor centred on the proposed road (250m on each side of the alignment) as a priority for the biodiversity surveys and then widened as required, depending on the biodiversity (e.g., greater for birds and smaller for flora) and the relevant ecologically appropriate areas of analysis (EAAAs) for potential biodiversity priority features. |
---|
方法步驟描述:
-
The mammal group is diverse and therefore requires diverse strategies for each mammal type of mammals as described below:
a. For small mammals, trapping methods were used with live traps set up in the surrounding areas along the proposed road within the EAAAs, to cover all habitat types within the study area.
b. For medium and large terrestrial mammals, observations of mountain slopes by binoculars and telescope were implemented (for ungulates such as the Armenian Mouflon and Bezoar goat), along with transects. Along the transects, indications of animals (tracks and droppings) were recorded. As many mammals species are furtive and hard to detect, 9 camera-traps were deployed in the most ecologically sensitive area of the project (excluding the area above the tunnel), south of the Bargushat tunnel.
Camera-trapping
Camera traps were used to gather data on large mammal movement and distribution, and to identify corridors, for daily movements and migration (especially for Armenian Mouflon). Nine camera-traps were deployed in key locations for potential presence of large mammal species. To optimize data collection, the camera traps were left onsite for several seasons, and represent in total 1,089 camera-trap days. -
Data on bird species diversity and relative abundance was sourced from unstandardized observations, including nest and lek (gathering of male birds) searches and standardized counts (data collected according to standard methodology). Both data can be used to create species distribution maps, while the second method can be used for estimates of species’ density and numbers.
-
Two different methodologies were implemented regarding bats:
a. Passive bat detectors (automated bat recorder) near potential feeding areas of bats: one close to Shamb reservoir and one close to Geghavank reservoir to document bat species diversity and to define bat activity and utilisation of riparian and aquatic habitats.
b. Manual bat detectors: transect surveys using Manual Bat detectors to assess bat species diversity and flight paths in the study area. Roosting and hibernating sites were also sought.
-
Herpetofauna studies were conducted through transect surveys.Those that were encountered and locations of permanent shelters were recorded with GPS.
-
Amphibian occurrence was obtained from two different types of observations:
a. Identification of species composition and relative number of amphibians at main water bodies, namely: reservoirs, ponds, rivers and streams. Water bodies were visited and specimens of amphibia examined, species identified, and species numbers determined and recorded. Amphibian surveys were conducted at 23 points, where the road could potentially influence surface water.
b. Night-time transects to record amphibia species migration on the road footprint and vicinity.
-
Fish were trapped to determine fish species in the study areas. 23 sampling sites within 50-100m of the road were equipped with crayfish device and fishing baskets. Fish were also caught using nets and fishing hooks. Species were determined visually using Pipoyan’s (2021) identification guide.
- Flora surveys targeted diversity of higher vascular plants and especially priority plant species. Data collection parcels were demarcated within the core habitat (squares of 100 x 100 meters). Within the sampling squares, all species were identified. Most plants were identified visually at the sampling sites; with plants requiring laboratory identification collected in herbariums and identified later.
額外的詮釋資料
替代的識別碼 | da71e98b-ca4a-4f9f-a8a1-87ea58fd449b |
---|---|
https://ipt-biotope.gbif.fr/resource?r=field_surveys_sisian-kajaran_road |